Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Katherine Sebov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Sebov analysis and find out who is favored!
Tena Lukas vs Katherine Sebov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 41.32% of points on his second serve, while Sebov has won 42.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 59.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sebov has won 61.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.16% and 37.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 50.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sebov has saved 53.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 60.53% of matches played (W/L 46/ 30), with Sebov winning 52.5% (W/L 21/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 239), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sebov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 50/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 34/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.33% of matches (W/L 46/ 29), where as Sebov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lukas winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lukas winning 2 and Sebov winning 0. The last match between Lukas and Sebov was at the Oeiras Ladies Open - Oeiras, 15-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Sebov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lukas winning 0 times and Sebov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 0, and Sebov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.87 while Sebov has played against players with an average rank of 266.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sebov has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 54.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sebov has converted 46.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lukas 1 - 0 Sebov
234
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
241
Rank
136
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
58% (425-309)
Career Total W/L
59% (241-165)
62% (18-11)
YTD W/L
43% (6-8)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$183,175
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tena Lukas | Katherine Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:42 | 1:24:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (40/66) | 59% (26/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (31/40) | 46% (12/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 9% (1/11) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (25/44) | 39% (26/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Katherine Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 43% (6/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (42/29) | 40% (12/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (334/303) | 47% (127/142) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (18/10) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.63 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 196 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:11 | 1:41:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 256.55 | 328.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1266/2141) | 73% (655/897) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (741/1266) | 56% (370/655) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (359/875) | 43% (103/242) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (163/294) | 47% (52/111) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (1035/2061) | 46% (412/888) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (18/10) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 20% (10/2) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Katherine Sebov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Katherine Sebov
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Katherine Sebov
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
54%
(
31 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Angelica Moratelli
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Katherine Sebov
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Katherine Sebov
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Katherine Sebov
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Ysaline Bonaventure
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
13
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(6) 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Sebov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
